EAD7  
DANCING WITH DISORDER: DESIGN, DISCOURSE & DISASTER  
  Discourse Abstracts   CONTACT  
     
 
DISCOURSE124
First Referee: Assıgned Back to Discourse Abstracts
Second Referee: Assıgned Next Abstract
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRACING DESIGN-DREAMS

Design is defined in many different ways. So is the role of designers. A general definition is that to design is to change the existing situation for the better. But who defines what is better? What are the designers’ responsibilities in an age of globalization and “post-industrialization”? Is it to enhance the life condition of the people, or is it to serve the system, to encourage more and more consumption, to create a fake (artificial) demand, and to create new dreams for people, those dreams that are not even their own dreams? In a world struggling with hunger, poverty and rapid consumption of limited resources, what designers can do and are doing? Are the designers out of system, trying to serve the community, using their knowledge and expertise in service of the poor, and even the ordinary people becoming the marginal ones? Pieces of designed objects are getting more and more a symbols of power and prestige and sources of cultural capital. Like works of art. Still many other questions related to responsibilities of designers (in different fields such as architecture, industrial design, graphic design, etc.) can be raised. This paper aims at discussing these questions, via an expanded search through design-related news in different types of mass-media, the texts in advertisements, etc., trying to discover the notions which are embodied in them and the massages which are conveyed explicitly, or as is the case most of the time, implicitly.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments of the 1st referee:
Rejected
Additional comments will be sent to the author
Comments of the 2nd referee:
Accepted wıthout revision
Additional comments will be sent to the author
SENT TO THE THIRD REVIEWER:
Comments of the 3rd referee:

Accepted wıth revisions